March 6, 2017 - Once again the calls for amalgamating the catholic and secular school boards in Ontario are starting to be heard. The arguments are familiar. Economies of scale at the administrative level. Reduction in duplication of core services (busing, payroll, purchasing). Eliminating wasteful duplication of facilities (gyms, cafeterias, libraries) and, as enrolments keep falling, getting rid of increasingly underutilized classroom space.
In addition, we are regularly reminded of the 1999 finding by the United Nations Human Rights Committee that publicly funding separate Catholic Boards in Ontario, while denying full funding to other religious schools, is discriminatory. Of course, that has moved neither Liberal nor Conservative governments to change much of anything at all.
The counter arguments to change are also familiar. The constitutional guarantee of independent funding for Catholic boards. The higher than average performance of the Catholic system versus the broader secular system on many educational outcome measures. The preference of parents for the stronger discipline and values focus delivered by Catholic schools.
There is an ugly side to the debate too. Is the push against separate boards more about anti-religious feeling than about educational efficiency and effectiveness? Is the opposition to change more about protecting those high paying administrative jobs than about protecting the constitutional rights and educational needs of the students? For that matter, is public union support driven by the dues all those new members will pay?
It is easy to get lost in the battle between entrenched interests. But, before we do, let’s consider some facts.
The population of Edmonton is about 900,000. The population of Northern Ontario is around 800,000. Northern Ontario has about twenty school boards. Edmonton has three. That said, Edmonton covers 684 square kilometers, Northern Ontario 844,000 square kilometers. Maybe we need those extra boards to administer our far flung system?
Fine. The province of Ontario, population 14 million, 1 million square kilometers, has close to 100 independent school boards. The country of New Zealand, population pushing 5 million, has 268,000 square kilometer of real estate and no school boards. That’s right, none.
Curriculum in New Zealand is designed by the national government. Teachers are certified by an independent body. Schools are run by the local community. New Zealand did away with the “middlemen”, and it works. New Zealand student achievement is very strong. Gaps between students (by gender, by race, by affluence) are narrower than you find in most other developed countries. Parental satisfaction is higher.
That said, New Zealand is not the end of the argument. The OECD has spent the last decade delving into data from their Program of International Student Assessments (PISA) in search of clues about student success. They have found several interesting things, including that the ability, even inside a single payer public system, to choose between programs of study has a measurable impact on student success.
With that knowledge in hand, Ontario can learn from a Canadian success story. A publicly funded, union staffed, locally run, fully inclusive, Canadian success story.
Edmonton Public Schools has Christian schools, Arabic schools, Hebrew schools, performing arts, elite sports, even a military academy. All under one administrative structure, supported by one shared services system, delivering the same (provincially approved) mandatory core curriculum, and in many cases sharing physical buildings, programs, and facilities. They also share online courses too, an important point for small communities in Northern Ontario.
Edmonton’s system maximizes unused classroom space by running one, two, sometimes three schools in the same building. They make their programs and facilities available to home schoolers and private schools as well. Everybody wins. Catholics in Edmonton keep their public funding, but everyone else gets the same access too. And it is inclusive. If they wish, Catholics can attend Muslim Academies, Hebrews can attend Catholic schools.
The Edmonton model takes the available educational and system evidence and puts it to work on the ground. This model of local school control is also, as New Zealand has proven, scalable.
How many school boards does one province need? How about none?
Charles Cirtwill is President and CEO of Northern Policy Institute. First published in Northern Ontario Business, February 2017.
The content of Policy Bytes is for general information and use. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Northern Policy Institute, its Board of Directors or its supporters. The authors take full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of their respective blog posts. Northern Policy Institute will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information, nor will Northern Policy Institute be liable for any detriment caused from the display or use of this information. Any links to other websites do not imply endorsement, nor is Northern Policy Institute responsible for the content of the linked websites.
Northern Policy Institute welcomes your feedback and comments. Please keep comments to under 500 words. Any submission that uses profane, derogatory, hateful, or threatening language will not be posted. Please keep your comments on topic and relevant to the subject matter presented in the blog. If you are presenting a rebuttal or counter-argument, please provide your evidence and sources. Northern Policy Institute reserves the right to deny any comments or feedback submitted to www.northernpolicy.ca that do not adhere to these guidelines.
1 Reader Comments
Posted By Carole Noel on 3/6/2017 3:58:21 PM
I'll argue that there is a need to maintain at least one French Board of Education. Francophones used to have their education needs managed through anglophone boards and it was a total fiasco. Francophones in the 1950s and 60s were among the less educated population in Ontario. This trend has been totally reversed since we obtained our French language schools in the 1970s and our French language school boards in the 1980s. Francophones have among the highest graduation rate in the province, not to mention that they are bilingual and have a higher rate of employment than the rest of the population. This was achieved in just over a few decades. At best I would question whether or not we need to have separate catholic and public school boards. Otherwise, I would recommend to leave the French Boards as they are.